Modernity and Liberalism (Hobbes between Schmitt and Strauss)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54789/rihumso.12.1.1.5Keywords:
Politics, morality, friend/enemy, Leviathan, AnmerkungenAbstract
Modern times propose a new horizon for the human beign. This period was also forged by thinkers such as Thomas Hobbes. Analyzing their work puts somehow in evidence the conceptual structures with which we understand our milieu. At the beginning of the twentieth century a famous discussion about the Hobessian position took place between two great thinkers that had an enormous influence in the contemporary political reflection: Schmitt and Strauss. The first one will try to separate the English philosopher from liberalism. The later one will try to give him fatherhood atributes. This article’s intention is to re build , through careful reading of the worka, the critic that Strauss does to Schmitt so then evaluate the possibilities and limitations of a modern political project.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2012 Andrés Di Leo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 International License.
The authors that publish in this Journal accept the following terms:
a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of this journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it inside a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal. All the works published on this Journal are retrieved and safeguarded in the Institutional Repository of this University: Repositorio UNLaM
c. Authors are allowed and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as this can lead to productive exchanges, as well as to enriching and enlarging the number quotations on the work published.